Skip to main content

Pennsylvania AG files suit against four loan mod companies

Nov 27, 2009

Consumer protection lawsuits were filed against four loan modification or “mortgage rescue” businesses, along with their officers, who are accused of deceiving Pennsylvania consumers seeking help modifying their mortgage loans. “Consumers struggling with high interest rates or large loan payments were drawn to these businesses by misleading ads, deceptive Web sites and false promises of ‘permanent changes’ to their mortgages,” Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett said. “Instead, many consumers paid large up-front fees that resulted in little, if any, relief from their mortgage problems – leaving them in even worse financial situations.” Corbett said the civil lawsuits were filed by the Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection against the following businesses and individuals: ► Foreclosure Awareness Inc., of Bensalem and Boca Raton, Florida, along with owner Michael Squillace. ► Nationwide Foreclosure Prevention Center LLC, of Williamstown, N.J., and owner Robert P. Valentin. ► Best Interest Rate Mortgage Company LLC, of Huntingdon Valley, Penn. and Westmont, N.J., as well as company President Michael J. Diplacido. ► U.S. Mortgage Mod LLC, of Philadelphia, and owner Marc Dambrosio. Corbett said that in addition to false or misleading claims about the ability to actually modify loans, some of the companies named in these lawsuits also allegedly used deceptive mailings to consumers designed to appear as if the correspondence came from a government agency or government-related program. Additionally, the companies did not provide consumers with state-required financial disclosure information, failed to inform consumers about their five-day right to cancel and accepted up-front fees without posting the necessary surety bond or trust account. Other companies were not licensed by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking to handle mortgage loans or loan refinancing. “For most consumers, their home is their single most valuable asset,” Corbett said. “Any business involved in credit-related activities, including loan modification and ‘mortgage rescue’ services, must give consumers clear and detailed information about the process before accepting payment.” Corbett said the consumer protection lawsuits announced are the result of an ongoing statewide investigation into loan modification services being conducted by the Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, along with the state Department of Banking, the Pennsylvania Department of State and the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (PHFA). Corbett thanked those agencies for their continued cooperation and assistance. Foreclosure Awareness Inc. Corbett said that Foreclosure Awareness Inc., operating from both Pennsylvania and Florida, is accused of using deceptive and misleading advertisements and failing to provide the services that were promised. The company allegedly boasted on its Web site, “we have helped hundreds of homeowners to gain a financial edge on what was once a loan gone bad.” The company also claimed they “can assist you with a smooth transition to help save your home,” and added in direct-mail advertisements, “We Help over 90 percent of the homeowners that call.” According to the consumer protection lawsuit, Foreclosure Awareness Inc. failed to deliver the promised services to consumers, resulting in complaints from consumers across the country. Corbett said the company also allegedly operated as a “credit services organization” without complying with Pennsylvania law, including requirements involving contracts, the mandatory five-day right to cancel and the posting of a surety bond or trust account with the Department of State, and also failed to register as a telemarketer. Nationwide Foreclosure Prevention Center Corbett said that Nationwide Foreclosure Prevention Center, using the Internet address, allegedly promised to “negotiate with your lender to stop your foreclosure and get you the best loan modification possible.” According to the consumer protection lawsuit, the company made numerous misleading advertising claims, including deceptive statements proclaiming, “We are an Attorney Based Company!” In reality, Nationwide Foreclosure Prevention Center had only one employee, owner Robert P. Valentin, who is not an attorney. Corbett said the company is accused of not providing services that consumers were promised, along with failing to inform consumers of their five-day right to cancel a credit services contract, not posting the required surety bond or trust account with the Department of State, operating a mortgage loan business without the required license from the Department of Banking and conducting telemarketing in Pennsylvania without registering with the Attorney General’s Office. Best Interest Rate Mortgage Company Corbett said that Best Interest Rate Mortgage Company, operating in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, allegedly used deceptive direct-mail advertisements that were designed to appear as if they were sent by a government agency. The company is also accused of misrepresenting the benefits of its services via their Web site and conducted telemarketing in Pennsylvania without registering with the Attorney General’s Office. According to the lawsuit, Best Interest Rate Mortgage Company violated the state’s Credit Services Act by accepting upfront payments for their services without having a bond or trust account in place with the Department of State. Additionally, the company’s business practices allegedly violated the Mortgage Act under which they are licensed by the Department of Banking. U.S. Mortgage Mod Corbett said that U.S. Mortgage Mod allegedly used misleading mailers and also made misrepresentations to consumers about its ability to help consumers obtain loan modifications. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that U.S. Mortgage Mod improperly accepted loan modification fees upfront, without the required bond or trust account posted with the Department of State, and engaged in telemarketing activity in Pennsylvania without registering with the Attorney General’s Office. Corbett said that all of the consumer protection lawsuits seek restitution for all consumers who were victimized, as allowed by law, along with civil penalties, fines and other court-ordered relief. For more information, visit
About the author
Nov 27, 2009
HUD Proposes New Rules Around Sale Of Delinquent Loans

Comments being accepted through Sept. 16.

Acting Comptroller Of The Currency Warns Of 'Next Great Blurring'

The complexity of relationships between banks, non-banks, and fintech intermediaries threatens to obscure systemic risk.

Bringing Buyer Agents Back To The Table

Dispelling misinformation about the broker commission lawsuits

CFPB Scores Statutory Victory In Townstone Redlining Case

Seventh Circuit affirmed CFPB's authority to discourage discrimination against prospective applicants

Jul 15, 2024
The New Frontier

In a modern lending landscape, be on high alert to safeguard against appraisal bias

CHLA Urges CFPB To End Trigger Lead "Junk Calls"

CHLA sends another letter urging the CFPB to focus on trigger lead solicitations.