Nationwide class action suit filed seeking OT pay for JP Morgan Chase underwriters – NMP Skip to main content

Nationwide class action suit filed seeking OT pay for JP Morgan Chase underwriters

Mar 30, 2010

Attorney Kelly M. Dermody of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP has announced the filing of a class action lawsuit charging that JP Morgan Chase & Company (Chase) had a common practice of misclassifying its loan underwriters as exempt and failing to pay them for all overtime hours worked in violation of federal overtime pay laws. Chase employs approximately 500-1,000 underwriters nationwide. "All of us underwriters worked long days and on weekends processing loan applications. We gave our all to bring in billions of dollars of revenue for Chase," said plaintiff Gayla Pickle. "It's only fair that they should pay us for all that overtime." "This lawsuit seeks fair compensation for the underwriters employed by Chase who tirelessly worked late nights and long weekends processing loans, which helped fuel Chase's success in the mortgage sector," said Plaintiff's Counsel Dermody. The lawsuit alleges that these workers were unlawfully denied overtime pay. In fact, Chase reclassified its underwriters to non-exempt status in February 2009, but failed to provide them backpay for the overtime hours they had worked while classified as exempt. Additionally, a federal appellate court recently ruled against Chase on the issue of whether Chase underwriters are exempt from federal overtime laws. Current and former Chase underwriters who wish to report their work experiences or learn more about the lawsuit can visit www.jpmcovertime.com. The site allows witnesses and claimants to contact plaintiffs' counsel. The lawsuit, entitled Pickle v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, was filed in U.S. District Court in New York, New York. For more information, visit www.lieffcabraser.com. 
About the author
Published
Mar 30, 2010
FHA Sets Jan. 1 Start For FICO 10T And VantageScore 4.0

Lenders will gain competing modern scoring options, but borrowers may not see both offered everywhere

Sep 11, 2026
FHFA Studies Credit-Report Changes To Cut Mortgage Costs

Pulte’s comments could signal either fewer bureau reports or a portable report borrowers could share among lenders, but FHFA has not clarified which approach it is studying

AI Errors Leave Mortgage Trustee Without Brief In Foreclosure Appeal

Outside counsel’s fabricated citations expose a third-party oversight risk for mortgage servicers, trustees, and investors

Sep 10, 2026
CHLA Wants Ginnie Mae Liquidity Backstop Ready Before Next Crisis

Proposed G-TALF facility could help prevent a servicing cash crunch from constraining FHA, VA, and USDA lending

FHFA Opens VantageScore To All GSE Lenders, Eyes Credit Report Overhaul

Pulte removes 50-lender cap while considering bi-merge and single-bureau reports as additional ways to reduce mortgage costs

Closing Costs: What HUD’s Proposed Rule Will Really Do To The Market

HUD’s proposed rollback of housing protections could deepen barriers for underserved borrowers, shrink the pool of prospective homebuyers, and ultimately cost loan originators business

Aug 27, 2026