Skip to main content

Appraisal Institute Calls for Formation of Investment Property Accounting Standard
Dec 15, 2010

The Appraisal Institute, the nation’s largest professional association of real estate appraisers, has recommended revisions to proposed lease accounting standards, urging the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to prepare a separate investment property standard comparable to its international counterpart.  The Appraisal Institute made its comments in a letter to the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board. Co-signed by the American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers, the letter came in response to proposed lease accounting standards put forth by FASB and IASB in August that would require the reporting of a company’s lease liabilities using a discounted cost model, rather than fair (or market) value. “As the largest professional organizations of real estate appraisers (valuers) in the United States, our organizations are strongly committed to improving the relevance and usefulness of financial reporting, particularly in the area of real estate. We commend and support the FASB and IASB’s effort to continue to develop high-quality accounting standards that improve the transparency, usefulness, and credibility of financial reporting,” the organizations stated. However, the organizations stated, “The proposed lease accounting standard attempts to apply a discounted cost model (i.e., an accounting approach) to real estate leasehold interests, when fair value measurements (i.e., a valuation approach) will provide a more accurate and transparent representation of real estate interests.” For several years the appraisal organizations have strongly urged FASB and IASB to require companies to report the value of their real estate holdings at current market value. The organizations urged consistency between the IASB and FASB exposure drafts in the area of investment properties and fair valuation. Currently, the IASB exposure draft exempts firms from the lease accounting arrangement if they adopt fair value rules under the investment property standard known as IAS 40. No similar exemption from the new cost based lease accounting standards is contained in the FASB Exposure Draft, because no comparable FASB fair value reporting standard for investment property currently exists. “As such, we urge FASB to complete the Investment Property project as soon as possible,” the organizations said. “Further, we support adoption of an exemption from the lease accounting standard for firms that adopt a fair value accounting model pursuant to an Investment Property standard, like the IASB has proposed.” The FASB and IASB proposals are partly in response to a report issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that called for greater exposure of firms’ lease obligations on their balance sheets.FASB and IASB will hold public roundtable meetings to discuss their August 2010 exposure draft on leases Jan. 5 in Chicago and Jan. 6 in Norwalk, Conn. Preparers, auditors, investors and other users of financial statements are among those expected to participate. FASB and IASB are expected to adopt the new standards sometime in 2011. For more information, visit
Dec 15, 2010
Chopra: Nonbanks, Mortgage Servicers May Also Pose Systemic Risk

CFPB director tells Consumer Bankers Association conference such a failure could lead to 'chaos.'

FHFA Announces Enhanced Mortgage Payment Deferral Policy 

Will allow GSE's borrowers facing financial hardship to defer up to six months of mortgage payments. 

MBA: Proposed Rule Would Stifle Securitizations

In letter to SEC, MBA says proposed rule on conflicts of interest is overly broad.

Fidelity National Financial To Pay N.Y. $3.5M, End ‘No-Poach’ Deals

N.Y. attorney general says such deals illegally stifle competition and reduce wages.

A License Renewal Program That Works

Your renewal season will be here before you know it. Do you have a program in place?

Housing Industry Groups Raise Concerns About BABA

24 organizations send letter to Biden Administration saying act could negatively affect development of affordable housing.