Skip to main content

Broker Accused of Defrauding Elderly Nuns in MBS Scam

Jan 12, 2011

The Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced that a Long Island, N.Y.-based investment broker has agreed to settle charges against him for defrauding a congregation of mostly elderly nuns in the Bronx. The SEC, which instituted administrative proceedings against Paul George Chironis in April 2010, found that he churned two accounts owned by the Sisters of Charity—one account with money for care of nuns in assisted-living facilities and a second account to support the nuns' charitable endeavors. According to the SEC's order, Chironis defrauded the nuns from January 2007 to January 2008 by churning the two accounts with low-risk tolerance that held primarily mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as certain closed-end bond funds. The order further found that Chironis charged the nuns' accounts excessive and undisclosed markups and markdowns in riskless principal transactions. Churning is a fraudulent practice that occurs when a broker engages in excessive trading in order to generate commissions and other revenue without regard to the customer's investment objectives. Chironis was formerly affiliated with Capital Growth Financial Inc., a broker-dealer firm that was based in Boca Raton, Fla., and is no longer in business. "Chironis took advantage of the trust placed in him by the Sisters of Charity and convinced the nuns to engage in a high turnover trading strategy unfit for their investment needs," said George S. Canellos, director of the SEC's New York Regional Office. "Chironis's irresponsible actions virtually guaranteed the convent's accounts would lose money due to the undisclosed and excessive costs being incurred while Chironis focused on generating substantial commissions for himself." The SEC's order specifically found that during a 13-month period, the Sisters of Charity's accounts paid approximately 10.8 percent of their value to Chironis in transaction fees. The nuns' accounts were charged an average markup of 3.68 percent on 46 bond purchases including mortgage-backed securities, and 3.03 percent on 33 closed-end bond fund purchases. The congregation's accounts also were being charged an average markdown of 1.92 percent on 67 bond sales and 1.86 percent on 15 closed-end bond fund sales. The SEC's order found that Chironis violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Without admitting or denying any of the allegations in the civil injunctive action against him, Chironis agreed to an order barring him from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, transfer agent, municipal advisor, or nationally recognized statistical ratings organization. The order also prohibits him from serving or acting as an employee, officer, director, member of an advisory board, investment adviser or depositor of, or principal underwriter for, a registered investment company or affiliated person of such investment adviser, depositor, or principal underwriter. Additionally, Chironis agreed to pay a $100,000 penalty and $250,000 in disgorgement that will be placed in a Fair Fund and distributed to the Sisters of Charity. For more information, visit www.sec.gov.
About the author
Published
Jan 12, 2011
Cost Of Ransomware Attack: $12 To $17M

loanDepot tells federal regulators that the cybersecurity incident will impact its Q1 earnings.

Post-Closing Challenges For Mortgage Brokers

How to navigate repurchase and clawback demands

Challenges And Solutions To Home Lending In Native American Communities Presented By NCRC

Bankers from around the nation participate in Redlining the Reservation webinar.

How Burnett v. NAR Will Impact The Mortgage Industry

Decision could make process harder for first-time buyers

First National Bank of Pennsylvania Settles Redlining Charges For $13.5 Million

Justice Department accuses major mortgage lender of discriminating against Black and Latino homebuyers in North Carolina.