Skip to main content

Connecticut Woman Gets Three Years of Probation for Role in Mortgage Fraud Scheme
Mar 16, 2011

David B. Fein, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, has announced that Mary Ellen Durso of Milford, Conn. was sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Mark R. Kravitz in New Haven to three years of probation, the first six months of which Durso must spend in home confinement, for her involvement in mortgage fraud scheme. On Dec. 14, 2010, Durso pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy stemming from the scheme, and five counts of filing false tax returns. According to court documents and statements made in court, Durso conspired with others to commit bank fraud by filing a materially false loan application to Washington Mutual to refinance a condominium in Hillsboro Beach, Fla. Durso served as the straw owner for the condo in order to obtain the fraudulent proceeds for the benefit of her co-conspirators. On Sept. 20, 2007, after the refinance loan had been approved and funded, $233,874.98 was wired into Durso’s bank account. The next day, Durso obtained two cashier’s checks totaling $155,544 for the benefit of her co-conspirators. Durso also gave her co-conspirators signed and unsigned blank checks to her bank account to allow them to write checks payable to themselves or to entities they controlled. As part of the scheme, one of her co-conspirators paid the mortgage by writing checks to Durso. The checks were deposited in Durso’s bank account, and then mortgage payments were automatically withdrawn from the account, making it appear that the funds for the payment came from Durso. By the summer of 2008, the mortgage payments had stopped, and the condo subsequently went into foreclosure. The home was then deeded to Freddie Mac before being resold for approximately $35,000 less than the outstanding principal balance on the original refinance loan. Durso also filed false tax returns for tax years 2004 to 2008 by inflating her itemized deductions, including her mortgage interest and medical expenses, resulting in a tax loss of approximately $46,000 to the government. Judge Kravitz ordered Durso to pay restitution to Freddie Mac, and back taxes, plus penalties and interest, to the government.
The New URLA – What’s the Big Deal?

Lenders will need to update their technology stack to comply with the redesigned URLA.

Regulation and Compliance
Jun 14, 2021
Texas State Legislators Looks To Protect Reverse Mortgage Borrowers

A Texas House Bill has been introduced to prevent false, misleading or deceptive advertising by reverse mortgage lenders.

Jun 02, 2021
Could Prudential Standards for Nonbank Mortgage Servicers be Eased?

From The Desk Of The “Om-Bobs-Man”

Regulation and Compliance
May 31, 2021
Get Ready to Duck and Cover

After years of hands-off attitude by regulators, a new wave of mortgage enforcement is building. Expect a tsunami.

Regulation and Compliance
May 13, 2021