Skip to main content

Four Florida Men Arrested in Foreclosure Rescue Scam

NationalMortgageProfessional.com
Aug 09, 2011

Christopher S. Godfrey of Delray Beach, Fla.; Dennis Fischer of Highland Beach, Fla.; Vernell Burris Jr. of Boynton Beach, Fla.; and Brian M. Kelly of Boca Raton, Fla. have been arrested on charges that they defrauded homeowners in Massachusetts and elsewhere in connection with a home loan modification scam, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz for the District of Massachusetts, and Christy L. Romero, the Acting Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP). The 20-count indictment against Godfrey, Fischer, Burris Jr. and Kelly charges them with conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud, and misuse of a government seal. The defendants were arrested by SIGTARP agents. According to the indictment, Godfrey was the president and Fischer was the vice president and treasurer of a Florida company called Home Owners Protection Economics Inc. (HOPE). Burris was the manager and primary trainer of HOPE telemarketers, while Kelly was  one of the principal telemarketers, as well as a trainer for other HOPE telemarketers. The indictment alleges that from January 2009 through May 2011, the defendants made, and instructed their employees to make, a series of misrepresentations to induce financially-distressed homeowners looking for a federally-funded home loan modification to pay HOPE a $400-$900 upfront fee in exchange for HOPE’s home loan modifications, modification services and “software licenses.” According to the indictment, these misrepresentation included claims that homeowners were virtually guaranteed, with HOPE’s assistance, to receive a loan modification under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), which is part of TARP and is a federally-funded mortgage assistance program. Additional misrepresentations to  homeowners included that HOPE was affiliated with the homeowner’s mortgage lender, that the homeowner had been approved for a home loan modification, that homeowners could stop making mortgage payments while they waited for HOPE to arrange their loan modification, and that HOPE would refund the customer’s fee if the modification was not successful. HOPE also claimed that it operated as a non-profit organization. In exchange for these upfront fees, HOPE allegedly only sent its customers, including homeowners in Massachusetts, a do-it-yourself application package that was nearly identical to the application the U.S. government provides free of charge. HOPE instructed customers to fill  out the application and submit it to their mortgage lender. According to the indictment, the HOPE customers who did use the provided forms to apply on their own for loan modifications had no advantage in the application process, and, in fact, most of their applications were denied. Through these misrepresentations, HOPE was able to persuade thousands of homeowners collectively to pay more than $3 million in fees to HOPE. Godfrey and Fischer were charged with one count of conspiracy, nine counts of wire fraud, nine counts of mail fraud and one count of misuse of a government seal. Burris and Kelly were charged with one count of conspiracy, nine counts of wire fraud and nine counts of mail fraud. Each count of conspiracy and misuse of a government seal carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Each count of mail and wire fraud carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. All of the defendants face possible orders of restitution.
Published
Aug 09, 2011
Fed Slows Rate Hike Pace, OK’s 0.25% Bump

Rate hike is 8th since March 2022.

Regulation and Compliance
Feb 01, 2023
Report: Fannie, Freddie Note Sales Undercut Homeownership Goals

National Consumer Law Center report says sales to private investors strip borrowers of access to loss-mitigation options.

Regulation and Compliance
Jan 31, 2023
FHA Expands COVID-19 Recovery Loss-Mitigation Options

Updated and expanded options intended to help more borrowers avoid foreclosure.

Regulation and Compliance
Jan 31, 2023
Complex Algorithms Causing Complex Compliance Issues

Complying with Reg B and ECOA on adverse action

Regulation and Compliance
Jan 27, 2023
The State Of Remote Work In Mortgage

Regulations are catching up with remote work, are you prepared?

Regulation and Compliance
Jan 27, 2023
Becoming The Interest Rate Expert

Understand the five main variable components of rate-sheet pricing and interest rates

Regulation and Compliance
Jan 27, 2023