Wells Fargo and Chase Scrutinized for Excessive Default Fees – NMP Skip to main content

Wells Fargo and Chase Scrutinized for Excessive Default Fees

Feb 13, 2012

Baron and Budd attorneys, led by Roland Tellis and Mark Pifko in Los Angeles, have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase illegally levied excessive and deceptive default service fees against borrowers who were late on mortgage payments. The suit states that Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, who, together, service approximately 25 percent of all U.S. mortgages, allegedly cheated hundreds of thousands of borrowers by charging abusive default fees. Baron and Budd attorneys believe that the two banks may have potentially defrauded borrowers out of a billion dollars or more. “Wells Fargo and Chase executives conspired to increase profits in any way they can, even if that meant deceiving homeowners who were losing out on the American dream,” said Tellis. "In addition to charging unnecessary and marked-up fees, the banks concealed the fees through cryptic wording." According to the suit, the amount of the inflated or unnecessary charges can vary, from $20 for some services, to as much as $135 for others. As part of the banks’ efforts to hide the true nature of the charges, these fees are typically listed on a borrower’s monthly statements as “Other Charges,” “Miscellaneous Fees” or “Corporate Advances.” According to the lawsuit, the fees are charged when a borrower is late on a payment, and the bank’s computer programs begin the default process by levying fees against the borrower. One of these fees is used to hire a real estate broker to assess the value of the home based on similar properties, the broker price opinion (BPO) and the BPO is used to help the lender price the property for foreclosure. Federal law allows lenders to charge these BPO fees, but they are not allowed to mark up the charges or perform unnecessary services and make a profit, which is what Wells Fargo and Chase have done, according to the suit. “Our investigation has revealed that as a result of these practices, banks often make more money from loans that are in default than loans that are current," said Pifko. “Loan agreements require that default-related services must be reasonable and appropriate. Banks are not allowed to mark-up the charges so they can make a profit, but that is exactly what they have done. In many cases, the banks are overcharging by as much as 300 percent.”
About the author
Published
Feb 13, 2012
Senate Passes 21st Century ROAD To Housing Act In 85-5 Vote

Sweeping housing package heads back to House after Senate clears final version with broad bipartisan support

MISMO Updates Business Glossary To Support AI, eMortgages

New definitions covering eHELOCs, remote online notarization, valuation modernization, and compliance initiatives aim to improve consistency

Underwriters Don’t Slow Down Loans. They Eliminate Uncertainty.

ndustry’s biggest bottleneck is not underwriting itself — it is the uncertainty that reaches underwriting too late in the process. When validation happens upstream, speed follows naturally.

MISMO Launches AI Governance Framework For Mortgage Lenders

New FRAME toolkit gives lenders, servicers, and technology providers a roadmap for managing AI risk while supporting innovation

CFPB Tells Lenders Immigration Status Can Factor Into ATR Analysis

CFPB frames immigration status as a potential ability-to-repay factor when future U.S.-based income is at risk

UAD 3.6 Deadline Nears; First American Earns Verification

First American's ACI Sky Workbench gains verification ahead of the Nov. 2 implementation date for the GSEs' updated appraisal reporting requirements