Wells Fargo and Chase Scrutinized for Excessive Default Fees – NMP Skip to main content

Wells Fargo and Chase Scrutinized for Excessive Default Fees

Feb 13, 2012

Baron and Budd attorneys, led by Roland Tellis and Mark Pifko in Los Angeles, have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase illegally levied excessive and deceptive default service fees against borrowers who were late on mortgage payments. The suit states that Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, who, together, service approximately 25 percent of all U.S. mortgages, allegedly cheated hundreds of thousands of borrowers by charging abusive default fees. Baron and Budd attorneys believe that the two banks may have potentially defrauded borrowers out of a billion dollars or more. “Wells Fargo and Chase executives conspired to increase profits in any way they can, even if that meant deceiving homeowners who were losing out on the American dream,” said Tellis. "In addition to charging unnecessary and marked-up fees, the banks concealed the fees through cryptic wording." According to the suit, the amount of the inflated or unnecessary charges can vary, from $20 for some services, to as much as $135 for others. As part of the banks’ efforts to hide the true nature of the charges, these fees are typically listed on a borrower’s monthly statements as “Other Charges,” “Miscellaneous Fees” or “Corporate Advances.” According to the lawsuit, the fees are charged when a borrower is late on a payment, and the bank’s computer programs begin the default process by levying fees against the borrower. One of these fees is used to hire a real estate broker to assess the value of the home based on similar properties, the broker price opinion (BPO) and the BPO is used to help the lender price the property for foreclosure. Federal law allows lenders to charge these BPO fees, but they are not allowed to mark up the charges or perform unnecessary services and make a profit, which is what Wells Fargo and Chase have done, according to the suit. “Our investigation has revealed that as a result of these practices, banks often make more money from loans that are in default than loans that are current," said Pifko. “Loan agreements require that default-related services must be reasonable and appropriate. Banks are not allowed to mark-up the charges so they can make a profit, but that is exactly what they have done. In many cases, the banks are overcharging by as much as 300 percent.”
About the author
Published
Feb 13, 2012
Illinois Changes Property Tax Foreclosure Process To Return Surplus Equity

Borrowers can save remaining home equity after delinquent property taxes and fees are paid

CFPB Weighs Changes To TRID Timing And Mortgage Rescission Rules

The bureau is seeking feedback on whether federal disclosure requirements raise costs, delay closings or limit access to mortgage credit

CFPB Issues AI Underwriting Guidance On Adverse Action Notices

The agency says proprietary and machine-learning models do not relieve lenders of their fair lending and disclosure responsibilities

VantageScore Says 4.0 Model Could Unlock $1 Trillion In Mortgage Originations

New study says VantageScore 4.0 scores five million more creditworthy borrowers than FICO Score 10T, expanding lending opportunities as the industry prepares for the GSE credit score transition

MISMO Updates Mortgage Insurance Standards To Support FICO 10T, VantageScore 4.0

New implementation guide standardizes mortgage insurance data exchange, helping lenders, insurers and technology providers prepare systems for newer credit scoring models

Congress Weighs New Roadmap To End Fannie, Freddie Conservatorship

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald's three-bill housing package would establish a statutory framework for releasing the GSEs while expanding construction lending and easing some TRID compliance requirements