Skip to main content

HUD Charges Bank of America With Discrimination Against Disabled Homebuyers

Feb 27, 2012

The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) is charging Bank of America with discriminating against homebuyers with disabilities. HUD claims that Bank of America imposed unnecessary and burdensome requirements on borrowers who relied on disability income to qualify for their home loans and required some disabled borrowers to provide physician statements to qualify for home mortgage loans. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in the terms and conditions of a loan to an individual based on a disability, including imposing different application or qualification criteria, and makes it illegal to inquire about the nature or severity of a disability except in limited circumstances not applicable here. “Holding homebuyers with disabilities to a higher standard just because they rely on disability payments as a source of income is against the law,” said John Trasviña, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “Mortgage companies may verify income and have eligibility standards but they may not single out homebuyers with disabilities to delay or deny financing when they are otherwise eligible.” HUD’s charge is based on a “Secretary-initiated investigation,” and the investigation of complaints filed by two individual borrowers in Michigan and one borrower in Wisconsin who claimed that Bank of America required them to provide personal medical information and documentation regarding their disability and proof of continuance of their Social Security payment in order to qualify for a home mortgage loan. The charge is also being issued as part of the work being conducted by the Federal Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force’s non-discrimination working group. According to HUD’s charge, Bank of America allegedly asked some borrowers for proof of their disabilities and sought evidence of the continuation of their Social Security income before approving loans, after first denying them. The matter will now be handled by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
About the author
Published
Feb 27, 2012
Tug-Of-War Continues Between President Trump, Fed Chair Powell Over Rate Cuts

President’s April 17 social media post expresses growing impatience with Federal Reserve Board not cutting rates

Apr 18, 2025
Mortgage Insurance Premium Tax Write-Off Back On The Table

Bipartisan bill would restore, expand expired MIP deduction, aiming to ease homeownership costs for millions

Apr 15, 2025
FBI Boston Warns Of Growing Title Fraud

Fraudsters forging documents to sell properties or take out mortgages on them, FBI says

Apr 14, 2025
Remembering Kevin DeLory

Equity Prime Mortgage executive, 53, passes away after battle with cancer

Apr 10, 2025
UWM Taps Google To Double Loan Output

The strategic partnership brings AI-driven automation and cloud technology to streamline the home loan process for brokers and borrowers

Apr 08, 2025
Only First-Time Buyers Should Get Mortgage Interest Deduction, UI Says

Urban Institute proposes changing the tax code, but will policymakers and trade groups go for it?

Apr 04, 2025