Skip to main content

FinCEN Examines Title and Escrow Fraud

Jul 11, 2012

Pressing forward in its efforts to address a wide range of criminal risks, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has released its first targeted study analyzing reports indicating suspicious activities involving the real estate title and escrow industry. The study identified thousands of instances where financial institutions, particularly banks and Money Services Businesses (MSBs), filed suspicious activity reports (SARs) involving title and escrow companies, often in connection with mortgage fraud. FinCEN does not currently require title and escrow companies themselves to file SARs, but many have reported suspicious activities by annotating the Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business (FinCEN Form 8300) that they are required to file. "This first baseline study will help inform our ongoing efforts to identify regulatory gaps that criminals look to take advantage of," said FinCEN Director James H. Freis Jr. "We can now more efficiently and effectively address those gaps and mitigate those risks through public awareness, support to law enforcement, or appropriate regulatory action." The study presents a range of typologies where title and escrow companies appear to have been abused by money launderers, as well as a number of cases where the companies, or criminals fraudulently representing themselves as legitimate companies, were suspected of being involved in facilitating illegal activity. This comprehensive review provides greater context to understand the individual instances previously identified by FinCEN in its studies of mortgage fraud and money laundering in the real estate industries, as well as in supporting criminal investigations and prosecutions that involved title and/or escrow companies. Structuring, false statement, and mortgage loan fraud were the primary activities reported from 2003 through 2011, the period which FinCEN analyzed. The study covers 11,800 records filed by depository institutions, 10,000 records filed by MSBs, and over 1,000 annotated Forms 8300 filed by title and escrow companies. FinCEN has engaged with law enforcement, as well as federal and state regulators (in particular those with some oversight of title and escrow companies), to better understand the criminal risks as well as possible opportunities to mitigate them. FinCEN continues to act to close regulatory gaps that unaddressed could allow increased criminal abuse of the housing finance system. Final regulations that require non-bank residential mortgage lenders and originators to establish anti-money laundering (AML) programs and file SARs become effective on August 13, 2012. Proposed regulations that would require the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)—Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks to develop AML programs and file SARs are pending finalization.
About the author
Published
Jul 11, 2012
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.