MBA Applauds Bipartisan QM Proposal – NMP Skip to main content

MBA Applauds Bipartisan QM Proposal

Mar 15, 2013

Debra W. Still, CMB, Chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), applauded HR 1077, the Consumer Mortgage Choice Act, introduced earlier in March in the U.S. House of Representatives by Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI). The bipartisan bill would modify the definition of points and fees in the Dodd-Frank Act’s Ability to Repay/Qualified Mortgage provisions to improve access to affordable mortgage credit for qualified borrowers. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, loans that have points and fees in excess of three percent of the loan amount cannot qualify for the Qualified Mortgage definition that allows lenders to meet the ability to repay test. Non-QM loans carry with them greater liability for lenders, and thus will be more expensive or less available for borrowers. “Determining a borrower’s ‘ability to repay’ is a critical part of underwriting a safe and sustainable mortgage, and MBA has worked closely with policymakers to craft a QM rule that works best for borrowers and lenders alike,” said Still. “In our review of the final rule, we have identified several concerns with the points and fees calculation that have the potential to limit the choices that borrowers have when selecting a mortgage and increasing the costs of getting those mortgages. This bill goes a long way toward addressing those concerns.”  HR 1077 would increase choices and lower costs for borrowers by making the following modifications to the points and fees calculation used to determine whether a loan meets the Qualified Mortgage definition: ► Excluding fees paid to lender-affiliated title entities (fees paid to unaffiliated entities are already excluded); ► Preventing double counting of loan officer compensation; ► Clarifying that amounts held in escrow accounts for payment of homeowners insurance, which are not retained by the lender or its affiliates, should not be included in the calculation; ► Excluding lender charges necessary to cover Loan Level Price Adjustments (LLPAs) charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; and ► Excluding lender-paid compensation to a correspondent bank or mortgage brokerage in a wholesale transaction.
About the author
Published
Mar 15, 2013
Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets

CRA Proposal Could Reshape Bank Lending And Affordable Housing Investment

The OCC and FDIC would put more weight on lending while easing community development requirements for hundreds of banks

Fannie Mae AI Governance Deadline Arrives Aug. 6

Seller/servicers using artificial intelligence in origination or servicing must have formal policies, oversight, and vendor controls in place