Eliminating Federal Tax Code for Mortgage Deduction Would Shrink Economy by $254 Billion – NMP Skip to main content

Eliminating Federal Tax Code for Mortgage Deduction Would Shrink Economy by $254 Billion

Jul 30, 2013

Eliminating the federal tax code’s deduction for mortgage interest could have a dramatically negative effect on jobs and economic growth if not paired up with other tax reforms to cushion the impact, according to a new study by the Tax Foundation. The mortgage interest deduction is one of the largest tax expenditures currently being reviewed in Congress for possible elimination as part of comprehensive tax reform legislation.  The Tax Foundation’s economic model finds that after the effects of eliminating the mortgage deduction are fully phased in, the economy would shrink by $254 billion, the nation would lose 659,000 jobs, and wages would be 1.1 percent lower. In addition, even though initial calculations call for $101 billion in additional federal revenue, a “dynamic” estimate taking into account long-term economic interactions predicts a much smaller actual revenue increase of $39 billion. “The mortgage interest deduction is a controversial provision and there are legitimate policy arguments beyond just its impact on revenue for whether it should be retained or eliminated,” said Tax Foundation Fellow Dr. Michael Schuyler. “For the purposes of our estimate, however, we’ve set aside questions of encouraging home ownership or unequal investment treatment and focused on the impacts on economic growth.” The negative impact of eliminating the deduction, however, could be mitigated by pairing it with tax cuts that would stimulate investment and growth. If the additional revenue were used to finance an across-the-board income tax cut of 6.8 percent and allow small businesses to immediately write off the cost of new equipment, the economy would grow by an additional $50 billion, overall federal revenues would increase by a modest $8 billion, and an additional 255,000 jobs would be created. “The mortgage interest deduction is a dramatic reminder that as complex as the tax code is, simply eliminating major provisions is not necessarily the best solution,” said Tax Foundation President Scott Hodge. “The goal of tax reform is greater economic growth and prosperity for all Americans, and every proposed change should be focused on that goal.”
About the author
Published
Jul 30, 2013
Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets

CRA Proposal Could Reshape Bank Lending And Affordable Housing Investment

The OCC and FDIC would put more weight on lending while easing community development requirements for hundreds of banks

Fannie Mae AI Governance Deadline Arrives Aug. 6

Seller/servicers using artificial intelligence in origination or servicing must have formal policies, oversight, and vendor controls in place