Skip to main content

Nearly $2 Billion in Homeowner Relief Awarded to Arizona Homeowners Via Servicing Settlement

Aug 06, 2013

This summer, the Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight released its first report detailing results of their findings around the five largest servicers’ compliance with servicing standards established by the National Mortgage Settlement (NMS). Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne is releasing some of the highlights gathered from the report, specific to Arizona. This report demonstrates the first public step in a monitoring process that will continue for the next several years, providing the public with a new and transparent look into how banks are treating homeowners. The report shows that the Settlement, in addition to bringing $2 billion from the banks to Arizona residents, has had a profound and positive impact on mortgage servicing even in the early stages of such a large national effort. For example, after rigorous testing, the Monitor reports that the banks passed those tests that ensure they no longer engage in the practice of robo-signing—signing off on foreclosure documents with little or no review. The report also confirms that the five banks in the NMS (Bank of America, Chase, Citi, ResCap Parties, Wells), have stopped charging distressed borrowers a fee just to process a loan modification request and are adhering to proper customer payment processing procedures. With regard to Arizona specifically, as of May 20, 2013, the banks have reported engaging in a gross total of $1.8 billion in consumer relief activities for borrowers. $627.8 million was in the form of first and second lien principal reduction with an additional $223 million in the pipeline for borrowers in trial payment plans. In addition, almost 65,000 Arizonans who had their primary residence foreclosed upon received payments totaling $96.5 million. The Attorney General’s (AG’s) Office is also administering a $57 million program to provide relief to Arizona homeowners using funds from the Settlement.  As a result of a separate settlement with Bank of America, severely distressed borrowers from that bank received an additional $7.89 million in relief. Combining these amounts, the AG’s Office fought for, and won, over $2 billion in homeowner relief for Arizona constituents. It is important to note that the Office has not yet concluded its work and further negotiations with banks will result in more efforts designed to help distressed Arizona borrowers. There is still work to be done. Most notably, the banks continue consistently to fail to send notices and communicate decisions to borrowers in a timely manner, according to the Monitor. Because of this finding, the five financial institutions in the settlement are officially on notice; they must correct their problems and if a bank fails in either of the next two quarters penalties can include court orders, up to $1 million in civil penalties per each violation, and up to $5 million fine for repeated failures. Since the mortgage settlements were announced in February of 2012, the Attorney General’s Office has answered more than 4,000 consumer phone calls, 2,560 emails, and received more than 1,900 written complaints from consumers related to the mortgage crisis. A significant number of these contacts resulted in homeowners avoiding foreclosure, obtaining reductions in interest rates or principal amounts, or receiving restitution from businesses that charged improper fees or failed to do promised work. In addition, the Office continues to aggressively prosecute foreclosure rescue companies, and those involved in mortgage fraud at both the civil and criminal levels.
About the author
Published
Aug 06, 2013
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.