Skip to main content

Two Floridians Convicted in Loan Mod Scam

Nov 19, 2013

Christy Romero, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP), and Carmen M. Ortiz, United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, announced that two Florida men were convicted of defrauding homeowners in Massachusetts and elsewhere in a home loan modification scam. Christopher S. Godfrey of Delray Beach, Fla., and Dennis Fischer of Highland Beach, Fla., were convicted of conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud, and misuse of a government seal. From January 2009 through May 2011, Godfrey, Fischer, and their employees, operating under the name Home Owners Protection Economics Inc. (HOPE), made a series of misrepresentations to induce struggling homeowners looking for a federally-funded home loan modification to pay HOPE a $400-$900 upfront fee in exchange for HOPE's help obtaining modifications. Among these misrepresentations were the claims that, with HOPE's assistance, the homeowner was guaranteed to receive a loan modification under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), which is part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and is a federally-funded mortgage assistance program. HOPE also claimed that it operated as a non-profit. In exchange for these up-front fees, HOPE sent its customers, including homeowners in Massachusetts, a “do-it-yourself” application package, which was virtually identical to the application that the government provides free of charge. The HOPE customers had no advantage in the application process, and, in fact, most of their applications were denied. Through these misrepresentations, HOPE was able to persuade thousands of homeowners to pay more than $4 million in fees. “While our nation was mired in the housing crisis, Godfrey and Fischer ripped-off thousands of struggling homeowners to the tune of more than $4 million,” said Christy Romero, Special Inspector General for TARP (SIGTARP). “Godfrey and Fischer falsely advertised and guaranteed homeowners mortgage modifications through HAMP, the federal government’s TARP-funded housing support program. They promised homeowners, in exchange for upfront fees of up to $900, successful HAMP mortgage loan modifications. Instead, Godfrey and Fischer did little if any work on homeowners’ behalf and simply mailed them paperwork virtually identical to freely available HAMP applications, instructing homeowners to submit the applications on their own. Applying for a HAMP modification is free, and free federal mortgage counseling is available. SIGTARP and our law enforcement partners will not tolerate fraud related to TARP, and those guilty of utter disregard for the law and common decency will be brought to justice and held accountable for their crimes.”
About the author
Published
Nov 19, 2013
Taking Fannie And Freddie Public A Good Move Or Not: NMP Readers Respond

Survey returns mixed, polarized results from respondents — along with significant uncertainty

5 Questions On Potential Changes To Fannie And Freddie

Polunsky Beitel Green Principal Marty Green talks changes at the GSEs and impacts they could have on housing and mortgage

Housing, Economic Leaders Embrace New Digital Opportunities

It’s Crypto Week at the Capitol, with some getting ready for breakthrough regulations that could change financial services

Some Question Lenders’ And Others’ Readiness To Use VantageScore 4.0

Following FHFA announcement Tuesday, doubts arise regarding potential changes that may be needed to move to VantageScore credit scoring

HUD Freezes Foreclosures On FHA Mortgages In Texas Flood Zone

Kerr County homeowners among hardest hit in disaster that’s claimed more than 100 lives

Jul 09, 2025
Fannie, Freddie Now Allow Lenders To Use VantageScore 4.0

Lenders will keep tri-merge credit scoring model; what this shift means