ICBA Highlights Regulatory Burdens During Congressional Hearing – NMP Skip to main content

ICBA Highlights Regulatory Burdens During Congressional Hearing

Apr 09, 2014

The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) told members of Congress that community banks nationwide have identified regulatory burden as a top concern in providing credit in their communities. In a statement for the House Committee on Financial Services hearing, Who’s in Your Wallet: Examining How Washington Red Tape Impairs Economic Freedom, ICBA said that reducing regulatory burdens will help grow local economies and create jobs in local communities. “In order to reach their full potential as catalysts for entrepreneurship, economic growth, and job creation, community banks must have regulation that is calibrated to their size, lower-risk profile, and traditional business model,” ICBA said in its statement for the record. “A one-size-fits-all regulatory system for the banking sector is tremendously detrimental to community banks and the local economies they serve and support. Working with community bankers from across the nation, ICBA has developed its Plan for Prosperity, a platform of legislative recommendations that will provide reasonable and meaningful relief for community banks and allow them to thrive by doing what they do best—serving and growing their communities.” The multi-pronged Plan for Prosperity was designed in 2013 to help reduce excessive regulation for community banks while supporting greater regulatory accountability. Key provisions of the plan have been introduced in Congress and are moving through the House and Senate. The plan would: ►Provide “Qualified Mortgage” status for community bank portfolio loans, ►Exempt community bank portfolio loans from new escrow requirements, ►Expand mortgage rule exemptions for small servicers, ►Reinstate appraisal exemptions for certain community bank portfolio mortgages, ►Relieve publicly traded community banks and thrifts from accounting and auditing expenses, ►Support mutual banks with new charter options, ►Require a cost-benefit analysis for new rules, ►Reform the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to ensure more balanced regulation, and ►Modernize the Federal Reserve’s small bank holding company policy statement to support additional capital for these institutions. Referenced in ICBA’s statement was the George Mason University Mercatus Center’s recently released Small Bank Survey, which found that compliance costs have increased for more than 90 percent of community bank respondents. Additionally, the association reminded Congress that new mortgage regulations were enacted in response to abuses in which community banks did not engage. Community banks represent approximately 20 percent of the mortgage market, and the majority of that lending is concentrated in small towns and rural areas of the nation that are not effectively served by other financial institutions.
About the author
Published
Apr 09, 2014
Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets

CRA Proposal Could Reshape Bank Lending And Affordable Housing Investment

The OCC and FDIC would put more weight on lending while easing community development requirements for hundreds of banks

Fannie Mae AI Governance Deadline Arrives Aug. 6

Seller/servicers using artificial intelligence in origination or servicing must have formal policies, oversight, and vendor controls in place