Skip to main content

Smith Releases Initial Report Regarding Chase RMBS Settlement

Jul 23, 2014

Joseph A. Smith Jr. has released his Initial Report as Monitor of the JP Morgan Chase residential mortgage-backed securities settlement (Chase RMBS Settlement). On Nov. 19, 2013, the federal government, five states and JPMorgan Chase reached a $13 billion agreement to settle claims regarding the packaging, marketing, sale and issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) by Chase, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual to investors before the financial crisis. Smith was appointed by the settlement parties to monitor Chase as it distributes $4 billion in credited consumer relief. Under the settlement, Chase is required to provide relief to borrowers within essentially a four-year period ending Dec. 31, 2017. “Chase has begun to provide this relief, and my team and I have confirmed that Chase has provided approximately $6 million in credited consumer relief,” said Smith. “Prior to submission, Chase informed me that it would transfer 100 loans to its internal review group as a trial to ensure its testing procedures were appropriately designed. I consented to this approach. Chase further advised me that it had provided creditable relief to borrowers on additional loans through March 31 that were not included in the group of 100 initially tested. This additional activity will be reported to me in mid-August.” Chase is required to report to the Monitor quarterly on its consumer relief activities. After Chase’s internal review group tests and confirms the eligibility of these activities, it submits a report to the Monitor. Smith and the professionals he works with then thoroughly review this work and determine the amount of credit to which Chase is entitled. “I look forward to sharing additional results in my next public report on Chase’s consumer relief activity before the end of the year. I am honored to have been chosen to monitor this settlement, and my colleagues and I will do our very best to justify the faith the parties put into our work.”
About the author
Published
Jul 23, 2014
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.