Loan Officer Compensation Based on Referral Sources – NMP Skip to main content

Loan Officer Compensation Based on Referral Sources

Oct 02, 2014

Question: Can an MLO be paid different compensation for “Self-Sourced” referrals (i.e., originated loans that the MLO obtained through his or her own relationships) and “Company-Sourced” referrals (i.e., originated loans from a source in which the company or an employee of the company other than the MLO has a relationship, such as loans sourced through lead agreements, market servicing agreements or joint marketing agreements)?

Answer ...
While there is no direct answer to this question set forth in any of the relevant regulations, an examination of Regulation Z, as well as “unofficial” CFPB guidance, indicates that the answer is Yes. 
As we are all well aware by now, Regulation Z as codified by the Dodd-Frank Act prohibits loan origination compensation based on transaction terms, such as interest rate, or a proxy for transaction terms. [Section 1026.36(d)] 

A transaction term is any right or obligation of the parties to a credit transaction, except for the amount of credit extended. [Section 1026.36(d)(1)(ii)] Therefore, the referral source is not a transaction term.

A factor (which is not itself a transaction term) is a proxy for a transaction term if it meets two conditions:

►The factor consistently varies with a transaction term or terms over a significant number of transactions; and,
►The loan originator has the ability, directly or indirectly, to add, drop, or change the factor when originating the transaction.

Applying this definition to the issue presented reveals that the referral source is not a proxy for a transaction term, because the second condition is not satisfied. A loan originator does not have the ability to influence a referral source.

Noteworthy, this same question was posed to a CFPB presenter at the MBA’s 2014 Legal Issues & Regulatory Compliance Conference in San Diego. The CFPB representative concluded that MLOs could be paid differently based upon referral source, yet as we have seen all too often when it comes to the guidance of the CFPB, the Bureau’s presenter stated that his opinion was to be considered “unofficial” and not to be construed as official CFPB guidance.



Michael G. Barone is director of legal and regulatory compliance at Lenders Compliance Group. He may be reached by e-mail at [email protected].
 

 

About the author
Published
Oct 02, 2014
VantageScore Says 4.0 Model Could Unlock $1 Trillion In Mortgage Originations

New study says VantageScore 4.0 scores five million more creditworthy borrowers than FICO Score 10T, expanding lending opportunities as the industry prepares for the GSE credit score transition

MISMO Updates Mortgage Insurance Standards To Support FICO 10T, VantageScore 4.0

New implementation guide standardizes mortgage insurance data exchange, helping lenders, insurers and technology providers prepare systems for newer credit scoring models

Congress Weighs New Roadmap To End Fannie, Freddie Conservatorship

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald's three-bill housing package would establish a statutory framework for releasing the GSEs while expanding construction lending and easing some TRID compliance requirements

CHLA Backs Bank Capital Proposal, Questions Impact On Mortgage Lending

Trade group supports lower mortgage risk weights but says broader market forces — not capital rules — drove banks' retreat from the market

Senate Passes 21st Century ROAD To Housing Act In 85-5 Vote

Sweeping housing package heads back to House after Senate clears final version with broad bipartisan support

MISMO Updates Business Glossary To Support AI, eMortgages

New definitions covering eHELOCs, remote online notarization, valuation modernization, and compliance initiatives aim to improve consistency