Skip to main content

Virginia AG Sues 13 Banks for Bad RMBS

Sep 17, 2014

Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring has announced a historic lawsuit against some of the largest commercial banks in the world for fraud committed against Virginia taxpayers during the height of the real estate bubble. A lawsuit unsealed today in Richmond Circuit Court seeks $1.15 billion in damages against 13 banks that are each accused of fraudulently misleading the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) during the sale of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) to the state retirement fund. The VRS was entitled to accurate information about the underlying mortgages when making decisions on how to invest taxpayer money and contributions by employees. Instead, these large banks purposefully included high-risk mortgages in securities and fraudulently misrepresented the quality of those loans to rating agencies and large investors like VRS. The securities were purchased starting around 2004, and before 2010, Virginia was forced to sell the vast majority of these toxic securities built on junk mortgages and lost $383 million. In 2013, VRS was funded approximately 66 percent by Virginia taxpayers and 33 percent by contributions from state employees, with nearly 600,000 members including 145,000 teachers, 105,000 employees of city and county governments, and 78,000 state employees, as well as state troopers, local law enforcement, and court employees. This is a rare state-level action brought by an Attorney General to hold banks accountable specifically for damages their fraud and recklessness caused state taxpayers through a public retirement system. It is the largest financial fraud action ever brought by the Commonwealth of Virginia and is the largest case ever brought under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. The Commonwealth will also seek civil penalties against each bank in the amount of $5,500-$11,000 for each violation. "The message today is clear. It doesn't matter if you're a small-time con artist or a multi-billion dollar Wall Street bank. If you try to rip off or defraud Virginia consumers or Virginia taxpayers, you will be caught and you will be held responsible," said Attorney General Herring. "Every Virginian was harmed by the financial crisis. Homes were lost, retirement accounts were devastated, small businesses saw their credit dry up almost overnight, and state and federal budget cuts hurt vulnerable Virginians. It will take many more years to recover the economic strength and stability we lost, but I will not allow Virginians to be left holding the bag for the reckless, fraudulent business practices of a few big banks who thought they were above the law. These banks lied to Virginia, and taxpayers and state employees lost hundreds of millions of dollars as a result." Each bank is alleged to have bundled risky residential mortgages into securities which were then sold to VRS in various quantities. The named banks are: ►Barclays Capital Inc. ►Citigroup Global Markets Inc. ►Countrywide Securities Corporation ►Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC ►Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ►Goldman, Sachs & Company ►RBS Securities Inc. ►HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. ►Morgan Stanley & Company LLC ►UBS Securities LLC ►WAMU Capital Corporation ►JP Morgan Securities LLC (and as current owner of Bear, Stearns & Co.) ►Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (and as current owner of Banc of America Securities LLC) While the banks offered the securities to VRS as stable, solid investments, an analysis shows that nearly 40 percent of the 785,000 mortgages backing 220 securities purchased by Virginia's retirement system were fraudulently misrepresented in a way that made them a significantly higher risk for default. These banks knew, or should have known, that claims they made about the quality of the mortgages were false, but they systematically disregarded and hid their own evaluations, and third-party evaluations, that revealed just how risky these securities were. The Commonwealth of Virginia suffered hundreds of millions in losses after receiving and relying on this false information. The banks misrepresented the underlying mortgages in the following ways: ►Misrepresenting the loan-to-value ratio of mortgages: A higher loan-to-value ratio significantly raises the risk of default. Across all banks, it was claimed that only 23.4 percent of loans were for more than 80 percent of the value of the property, when in reality, it was 54 percent. Additionally, 15 percent of homes were underwater, with mortgages that exceeded the value of the home. ►Misrepresenting the owner occupancy rate of the homes: Borrowers are more likely to default on a home they do not occupy, such as a vacation home or rental property. ►Misrepresenting the percentage of homes with a second mortgage: This is a major risk factor for default because borrowers with second loans tend to have fewer assets relative to the amount they have mortgaged. Hundreds of securities that were offered at AAA or similarly high ratings with a 0.00 percent mortgage delinquency rate were eventually downgraded significantly as delinquency rates of the mortgages skyrocketed, in some cases as high as 75 percent. While the losses to the Virginia Retirement System are estimated at $383 million, the law allows Virginia to seek "treble damages," or three times the actual damage, as compensation and to deter this kind of conduct. It is expected that money recovered as part of this suit will be returned to Virginia taxpayers and that damages suffered by VRS will be redressed.
About the author
Published
Sep 17, 2014
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.