Skip to main content

Boehner Praises House Approval of Two Housing Bills

NationalMortgageProfessional.com
Apr 15, 2015

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) offered a strong dose of congratulatory language on yesterday’s passage of two housing-related bills, while opponents to the legislation insisted they opened the door to a new era of predatory lending practices.

The bills included HR 650, the Preserving Access to Manufactured Housing Act, which sought to amend the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) by enabling a higher level of consumer access to affordable manufactured housing by updating the federal definition of a “high-cost mortgage.” The bill, sponsored by Rep. Stephen Fincher (R-TN), passed by a 263-162 vote.

Also included was HR 685, the Mortgage Choice Act, which addressed the calculation of points and fees in mortgage transactions with the goal of widening the classification of home loans that could meet qualified mortgage (QM) requirements. HR 685, sponsored by Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI), passed by a 286-140 vote.

Both bills passed in votes that ran mostly along party lines—only 22 out of Democrats supported HR 650 and 45 Democrats supported HR 685, while only one Republican voted against both bills. In response to the passage of the bills, Rep. Boehner praised the legislation as “bipartisan bills” and insisted they would benefit homeowners.

“Affordable housing is vital for low and middle income families and workers, but far too often, Washington’s regulatory overreach and red tape gets in the way of their American dream,” said Rep. Boehner. “By increasing access and promoting choice for consumers, this legislation will help more hardworking Americans get ahead and achieve financial independence.”

The bills were supported by financial services and housing industry trade groups, but faced opposition from advocacy groups including the Center for American Progress and the Center for Responsible Lending. The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more than 200 national civil and human rights organizations, tried to position the debate in terms of income and racial inequality, using an open letter to legislators to insist that these bills “would erode important safeguards against the sorts of predatory lending practices that led to the 2008 economic crisis, and they would harm low-income and minority homeowners who are still trying to get back on their feet.”

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), the ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, also voiced concern in a written statement, arguing that the bills would “ultimately bring back higher costs for borrowers, facilitate the kind of steering that forced so many into expensive mortgages that end in foreclosure, and undermine vital consumer protections enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act.”

Published
Apr 15, 2015
FHA Wants Input On Smaller-Balance Mortgages

Agency seeks industry input as a starting point to encourage greater origination of small-balance mortgages for FHA insurance.

Regulation and Compliance
Oct 05, 2022
Government Lending Has A Strong Digital Future

Long gone are the days of 300-page files and mail requests

Regulation and Compliance
Oct 03, 2022
Appraisal Business Fears Modernizing And Newcomers

Appraisers also need to mitigate appraisal bias

Regulation and Compliance
Oct 03, 2022
R.I. Mortgage Broker Pleads Guilty To $6M Ponzi Scheme

Decade-long scheme was used to finance a lavish lifestyle.

Regulation and Compliance
Sep 30, 2022
Fannie Mae Names Almodovar Its New CEO

Financial services veteran brings more than 30 years experience and a strong commitment to affordable housing.

Regulation and Compliance
Sep 29, 2022
OCC Fines Sterling Bank & Trust $6M Over Mortgage Fraud

Bank, parent company remain under criminal investigation by Justice Department and SEC.

Regulation and Compliance
Sep 27, 2022