Skip to main content

Unintentional TILA Violations

May 15, 2015

Question: We maintain good disclosure procedures, but sometimes we have a violation of TILA. The mistake is not intentional. It is systemic. Still, what do we say to a regulator when faced with a violation that was not in our control?

Answer: If a creditor (or assignee) can show by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was unintentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such errors, the creditor (or assignee) will not be held liable in a civil action for the violation.

Some examples of bona fide errors include, but are not limited to, clerical, calculation, computer malfunction and programming, and printing. However, an error of legal judgment with respect to a person’s obligations under TILA is not a bona fide error. [15 USC § 1640(c)]

Regulators have a view of errors that the ancient Stoics would appreciate. Epictetus, the great Stoic philosopher, said:

There are things which are within our power,
and there are things which are beyond our power.
(The Enchiridion, by Epictetus.)

Generally, when it comes to the regulators’ perspective, ‘things which are within our power’ are subject to higher liability and administrative action with respect to statutory penalties and remedies than ‘things which are beyond our power.’

Systemic errors may be controversial, given the complexity of system maintenance over a long period of time. Depending on the type of violation caused by this kind of TILA error, it is a good idea to notify the supervising regulator of the event or document the corrective action. Both responses would likely be viewed as acting in good faith.



Jonathan Foxx is president and managing director of Lenders Compliance Group, Brokers Compliance Group, Servicers Compliance Group and Vendors Compliance Group, national companies devoted to providing regulatory compliance advice and counsel to the mortgage industry. He may be contacted by phone at (516) 442-3456, by e-mail at [email protected] or visit www.LendersComplianceGroup.com

About the author
Published
May 15, 2015
Congress Fits Trigger Lead Ban Into The 2025 Budget

Senate Amendment 2358, banning 'abusive' trigger leads, was added to the Senate's Fiscal Year 2025 NDAA

Banks' Mortgage Lending Portfolios Laced With Climate Risk

New First Street Foundation analysis finds 57 banks with a total of $627 billion in real estate loans exposed to “material financial risk” from climate impacts.

Sep 23, 2024
NEXA's Drawn-Out Legal Battle With Smart Mortgage Centers Gets Dismissed

Lawsuit over alleged "stolen" client information gets dismissed due to a lack of evidence

Sep 20, 2024
Bank Mergers Face Additional Scrutiny By FDIC

FDIC considers small businesses and residential loan originations when evaluating a merger’s competitive effects.

Fair Lending’s New Groove

Recent litigagion may bleed into fair lending and agency regulation

Keep Cool, Calm, And Compliant

Lenders need to craft a culture of compliance and customer care