Skip to main content

Senate Committee Passes Regulatory Reform Bill on Party Lines

May 21, 2015

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee voted along party lines to pass the Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of 2015, with the committee’s 12 Republicans voting in favor and the 10 Democrats voting in opposition.

The 216-page bill is the creation of Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), the Committee’s chairman, and it seeks to make significant changes to federal housing policy, regulatory oversight of community banks and congressional oversight of the Federal Reserve. The Committee’s Democrats put forth a rival bill, but that was voted down by the Republican majority.

Sen. Shelby acknowledged the partisan split on the committee with a conciliatory message to his Democrat colleagues.

“Although we were unable to reach an agreement this time around, I believe that there is a great deal of mutual respect on each side and that certainly leaves open the possibility of working together in the future,” he said. “As I have said many times, I view this as just one step in a very long process.  Even if we report this bill on a partisan vote, I do not in any way see this as the end of the road.  In fact, I believe it presents another opportunity to explore areas of potential agreement before this bill goes to the Senate floor which I fully expect that it will. It remains our strong preference that we find a way to come together on a bipartisan basis before we reach that point.”

The bill has strong support among the leading financial services and housing industry trade associations. David H. Stevens, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), issued a statement praising, “Many provisions in this legislation” and urging Congress to “achieve a bipartisan agreement prior to its floor consideration.”

Other trade groups backing the bill include the American Bankers Association (ABA), the Credit Union National Association (CUNA), the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) and the National Association of Federal Credit Unions; it is also praised by Habitat for Humanity and the Bipartisan Policy Center.

However, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), the Committee’s ranking member, urged Capitol Hill Republicans to “stop fighting old battles” and dismissed the Shelby effort as “a one-sided wish list, pleasing to various interest groups but lacking any provisions to help the average American trying to navigate our financial system.” President Obama has also voice opposition to the bill.

About the author
Published
May 21, 2015
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.