Skip to main content

HUD Charges Salt Lake City Building Owner With Fair Housing Act Violations

Jun 12, 2015

The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) has announced that it has charged the owners of a three-story Salt Lake City, Utah, apartment building with violating the Fair Housing Act by making housing unavailable to prospective residents with disabilities. 

“For more than 25 years, persons with disabilities have had the right to keep assistance animals that help them perform everyday activities,” said Gustavo Velasquez, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “HUD will continue to work with our fair housing partners to ensure that owners and landlords meet their obligation to provide reasonable accommodations when they are needed.”

The case came to HUD’s attention when the Disability Law Center (DLC), a HUD Fair Housing Initiatives Program agency in Salt Lake City, filed a complaint after conducting fair housing tests. When a tester, posing as a prospective tenant whose husband uses an assistance animal, inquired about a unit that had been advertised on Craigslist, Sergey Krasovskiy allegedly refused to negotiate with her about the unit. Krasovskiy told the tester that he and his business partner “usually don’t accept animals.” The tester offered to provide a letter from her husband’s doctor verifying the need for the service animal.

The charge further alleges that when the tester asked if the service animal would be acceptable, Krasovskiy repeatedly said that he would have to check with his business partner or stated that he was unable to reach his business partner. Twice Krasovskiy promised the tester that he would call her back but never did. Shortly after the tester’s inquiries, Krasovskiy entered into two separate lease agreements with applicants who did not have disabilities.

The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities. This includes providing different terms and conditions to applicants with disabilities, refusing to make reasonable accommodations, and making housing unavailable to applicants with disabilities.

Discrimination based upon a person’s disability status continues to be the most common basis of complaints filed with HUD and its partner agencies. Last year alone, this form of housing discrimination accounted for 4,606 complaints or 54 percent of all complaints filed with HUD. 

HUD’s charge will be heard by a United States Administrative Law Judge unless any party to the charge elects to have the case heard in federal district court. If an administrative law judge finds after a hearing that discrimination has occurred, he may award damages to those harmed by the discrimination. The judge may also order injunctive relief and other equitable relief, as well as payment of attorney fees. In addition, the judge may impose fines to vindicate the public interest. If the matter is decided in federal court, the judge may also award punitive damages.

About the author
Jun 12, 2015
CFPB Proposes To Ban Medical Debt From Credit Reports

CFPB expects the rule would allow 22,000 additional mortgages to be approved every year.

Manufacturing Fair Lending

How data defines a modern theory of redlining

A Watershed Moment For Trigger Leads

Pending legislation collars controversial data sharing practice

CFPB Unveils Lender Naughty List For Repeat Offenders

CFPB calls out nonbanks that have broken consumer protection laws

Is It A Deal Or Chicanery?

Negotiating EPOs with lenders

Attorney Opinions Don’t Count

Title waiver pilot, unregulated title alternatives a risky game for lenders and taxpayers