CUNA Faults CFPB on HMDA Data Collection – NMP Skip to main content

CUNA Faults CFPB on HMDA Data Collection

Jan 11, 2016
The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) has criticized the magnitude of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) efforts to collect Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data

The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) has criticized the magnitude of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) efforts to collect Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data.

In a comment letter filed with the Office of Management and Budget, CUNA stated that the CFPB is exceeding the Dodd-Frank Act requirements on HMDA data collection, which requires 17 data fields. The CFPB, according to the trade group, is pursuing “a staggering 48 data fields.” far more than the 17 required by law.

“While Congress did authorize the CFPB to collect ‘such other information as the bureau may require,’ it is unlikely this grant is an unbridled delegation to the CFPB to more than double the amount of express data points that Congress had indicated for the bureau to collect,” the CUNA letter complained.

CUNA also faulted the CFPB for not what HMDA data it plans to make public, which is also among the Dodd-Frank requirements.

“In the HMDA rulemaking, the CFPB fell well short of this mandate and only adopted a ‘balancing test’ to balance the importance of releasing the data to accomplish HMDA’s public disclosure purposes against the potential harm to an applicant or borrower’s privacy interest that may result from the release of the data without modification,” the letter continued. “Input solely on a nebulous balancing test is in fact a blatant disregard of the statutory requirement to provide regulations, in consultation with other banking regulatory agencies, to determine which data points will be public.”

CUNA also requested an extension of the HMDA data collection compliance deadline to be moved to Jan. 1, 2018, with reporting to begin one year after. It also sought an exemption for institutions issuing 500 covered closed-end loans and 1,000 covered open-end loans, as well as a clearly defined safe harbor period for institutions making a good-faith effort to meet compliance guidelines.

About the author
Published
Jan 11, 2016
Closing Costs: What HUD’s Proposed Rule Will Really Do To The Market

HUD’s proposed rollback of housing protections could deepen barriers for underserved borrowers, shrink the pool of prospective homebuyers, and ultimately cost loan originators business

Aug 27, 2026
MISMO Gives Lenders A New Test For Mortgage AI Vendors

Two certifications move the industry’s FRAME initiative from governance guidance toward product-level validation and implementation

Aug 27, 2026
One Owner, Two GSEs: Would Fannie And Freddie Still Compete?

Oksenholt Capital says shared infrastructure could lower costs without weakening competition, but mortgage bankers have warned that common ownership could reduce lender choice, innovation, and market resilience

Aug 27, 2026
MaxClass: Education Meets Lead Generation

CEO Kelly Hendricks details how MaxClass and HomeQB are opening a new referral channel for originators

Fannie Mae Returns To Distressed-Loan Market With $214 Million Sale

The agency’s first nonperforming-loan offering in 13 months transfers 969 deeply delinquent mortgages to private buyers, including a small pool concentrated in Dallas-Fort Worth

Aug 20, 2026
Brief Refinance Shift Tests Mortgage Lenders’ Compliance Controls

Critical defect rate jumps 23.9% as math-based compliance findings expose the potential for one systemic error to affect loans across a lender’s book