HUD Charges Three California Foreclosure Rescue Firms With Fair Housing Act Violations – NMP Skip to main content

HUD Charges Three California Foreclosure Rescue Firms With Fair Housing Act Violations

Jan 15, 2016
The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) has announced that it is charging three Modesto, Calif. home loan modification companies and nine of their agents with violating the Fair Housing Act

The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) has announced that it is charging three Modesto, Calif. home loan modification companies and nine of their agents with violating the Fair Housing Act by targeting Hispanic homeowners for illegal or unfair loan audit and loan modification assistance because of their national origin. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing transactions, including those related to home mortgage loans, because of national origin. 

“Families struggling to stay in their homes need real help, not false promises that make a bad situation worse,” said Gustavo Velasquez, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “HUD will continue to take appropriate action against individuals and companies that victimize unsuspecting homeowners because of where they come from or the language they speak.”      

HUD’s charge of discrimination alleges that The Home Loan Auditors LLC; Century Law Center LLC; SOE Assistance Center Inc., and their agents lured struggling Hispanic homeowners into paying thousands of dollars for home loan audits that the homeowners never received and modification services that had little, if any, value.  The companies allegedly exploited the homeowners’ limited-English proficiency and used deceptive marketing in Spanish, at times making false representations, in order to mislead them.  Ultimately, the homeowners lost their properties due to foreclosure.

HUD’s charge will be heard by a United States Administrative Law Judge unless any party to the charge elects to have the case heard in federal district court. If an administrative law judge finds after a hearing that discrimination has occurred, he or she may award damages to the complainants for their loss as a result of the discrimination. The judge may also order injunctive relief and other equitable relief, to deter further discrimination, as well as payment of attorney fees. In addition, the judge may impose civil penalties in order to vindicate the public interest. If the case is heard in federal court, the judge may also award punitive damages to the complainants.

About the author
Published
Jan 15, 2016
CFPB Issues AI Underwriting Guidance On Adverse Action Notices

The agency says proprietary and machine-learning models do not relieve lenders of their fair lending and disclosure responsibilities

VantageScore Says 4.0 Model Could Unlock $1 Trillion In Mortgage Originations

New study says VantageScore 4.0 scores five million more creditworthy borrowers than FICO Score 10T, expanding lending opportunities as the industry prepares for the GSE credit score transition

MISMO Updates Mortgage Insurance Standards To Support FICO 10T, VantageScore 4.0

New implementation guide standardizes mortgage insurance data exchange, helping lenders, insurers and technology providers prepare systems for newer credit scoring models

Congress Weighs New Roadmap To End Fannie, Freddie Conservatorship

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald's three-bill housing package would establish a statutory framework for releasing the GSEs while expanding construction lending and easing some TRID compliance requirements

CHLA Backs Bank Capital Proposal, Questions Impact On Mortgage Lending

Trade group supports lower mortgage risk weights but says broader market forces — not capital rules — drove banks' retreat from the market

Senate Passes 21st Century ROAD To Housing Act In 85-5 Vote

Sweeping housing package heads back to House after Senate clears final version with broad bipartisan support