Risk-Based Pricing Disclosure: Exceptions – NMP Skip to main content

Risk-Based Pricing Disclosure: Exceptions

Mar 17, 2016

Question: We have heard that there are exceptions to providing a risk-based pricing notice. Could you provide some information about a few of these exceptions?

Answer
There are several exceptions to the risk-based pricing notice. Important exceptions concern notice regarding specific terms, adverse action, and prescreened solicitations.

A residential mortgage lender is not required to provide a risk-based pricing notice to the consumer if a consumer applies for specific material terms and is granted those terms, unless (1) the terms were specified by the lender using a consumer report after the consumer applied for or requested credit, and (2) after the person obtained the report. For purposes of the exception, “specific material terms” means a single material term, or set of material terms (i.e., such as an annual percentage rate of 10%, and not a range of alternatives, such as an annual percentage rate that may be 8%, 10%, or 12%, or between 8% and 12%). [75 FR 2724, codified in 2011 at 12 CFR § 222.74(a) – FRB; 16 CFR § 640.5(a) – FTC]

A lender is also not required to provide a risk-based pricing notice to the consumer if the lender provides an adverse action notice to the consumer pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act requirements. [75 FR 2724, codified in 2011 at 12 CFR § 222.74(b) – FRB; 16 CFR § 640.5(b) – FTC]

With respect to prescreened solicitations, a lender is not required to provide a risk-based pricing notice to a consumer if the lender obtains a consumer report that is a prescreened list and uses the report for the purpose of making a firm offer of credit to the consumer. The exception applies to any firm offer of credit made by the lender to a consumer, even if the lender makes other firm offers of credit to other consumers on more favorable material terms. [75 FR 2724, codified in 2011 at 12 CFR § 222.74(c) – FRB; 16 CFR § 640.5(c) – FTC]



Jonathan Foxx is president and managing director of Lenders Compliance Group, Brokers Compliance Group, Servicers Compliance Group and Vendors Compliance Group, national companies devoted to providing regulatory compliance advice and counsel to the mortgage industry. He may be contacted by phone at (516) 442-3456, by e-mail at [email protected] or visit LendersComplianceGroup.com.

About the author
Published
Mar 17, 2016
Insuring The Risk To Lenders At Closing

Traditional protections like title insurance and closing protection letters may leave lenders exposed to significant settlement, funding, and fraud-related losses

CHLA Uses Trump Mortgage Order To Renew Push For LO Comp Reform

Community lenders want more flexibility over employee compensation, closing-cost estimates, down payment assistance, and federal supervision of smaller IMBs

Servicers Begin Testing Systems Ahead of VA Partial Claim Deadline

VA lenders and servicers have until Nov. 28 to implement the new loss mitigation waterfall and Partial Claim Program

ROAD Act’s Housing Incentive May Be Too Small To Move Supply

Realtor.com finds the median city risks losing only about $84,000, although the policy could carry more weight in supply-starved Northeast and Midwest markets

CRA Proposal Could Reshape Bank Lending And Affordable Housing Investment

The OCC and FDIC would put more weight on lending while easing community development requirements for hundreds of banks

Fannie Mae AI Governance Deadline Arrives Aug. 6

Seller/servicers using artificial intelligence in origination or servicing must have formal policies, oversight, and vendor controls in place