Lawsuit Against HUD Alleges Neglect In Refunding Mortgage Insurance Premiums – NMP Skip to main content

Lawsuit Against HUD Alleges Neglect In Refunding Mortgage Insurance Premiums

Mar 15, 2024
Staff Writer

HUD reportedly owes nearly $400 million in refunds to homeowners.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is accused of its purported failure to provide refunds on mortgage insurance premiums (MIP) to borrowers who chose to end their FHA-insured mortgages prematurely. Nearly $400 million in owed refunds to homeowners has been reported as of 2020, per Law360. 

Florida resident Tricia Sarmiento's proposed class-action lawsuit alleges that HUD has neglected to provide refunds linked to MIP payments for mortgages supported by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), further asserting that the refund request process has been intentionally sluggish and convoluted.

Per HUD regulations, the termination of an FHA loan within seven years of a home purchase or refinance triggers overpayment of the MIP, with the department required to refund the unearned amount.

A 2022 audit by the HUD Office of Inspector General (OIG) discovered a lack of adequate procedures related to the repayment of premiums. 

According to data from the OIG cited in the lawsuit, approximately 60,000 borrowers in Florida are entitled to refunds amounting to $22 million as of 2020. Nationwide, the unclaimed funds tally up to $384.7 million, with 200,576 borrowers terminating their mortgages over 20 years ago.

HUD watchdog audits conducted in 2020 and 2022 have highlighted these practices, revealing the department's lack of established protocols and sufficient procedures for reimbursing MIPs to borrowers.

"It is a fight for transparency, accountability and fairness," the suit said. "The federal agency's failure to uphold its duties has deprived thousands of homeowners of substantial refunds."

HUD declined to comment on the pending litigation.
 

About the author
Staff Writer
Sarah Wolak is a staff writer at NMP.
Published
Mar 15, 2024
More from
Courts
Better Deploys Poison Pill In Escalating Fight With Garg

The shareholder rights plan adds a 15% ownership trigger while the former CEO solicits shareholder consent to remove five of Better’s eight directors

Aug 20, 2026
Better Sues Garg After His Claimed Voting Majority Falls Short

The former CEO acknowledges an “administrative error” left him without enough consents to remove five directors, but his formal campaign for board control is moving forward

Aug 19, 2026
Two Harbors Responds To UWM Lawsuit; Ishbia Reassures Brokers

Two Harbors disputes UWM’s claims and questions its $603.2 million derivatives loss, while Ishbia says the wholesale lender has never been stronger

Aug 12, 2026
UWM Seeks More Than $500M From Two Harbors After Failed Deal

Lender alleges Two Harbors undermined their merger and steered the company toward CrossCountry, turning a costly acquisition failure into a federal court fight

Aug 10, 2026
UWM Previews Bid To Dismiss Rocket’s $100M Servicing Lawsuit

UWM argues Refi75 was permissible mass advertising

Jul 27, 2026
Kortas Secures Sole Ownership Of NEXA Lending

The settlement ends a multiyear legal battle between the co-founders of NEXA Lending

Jul 20, 2026