Skip to main content

Santa Maria, CA, Resolves Alleged Housing Discrimination

Staff Writer
Aug 09, 2021

The city ordinance imposed a “discretionary conditional use permit requirement” on housing for employees, directed at H-2A foreign national farmworker visa-holders.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • The city ordinance imposed a “discretionary conditional use permit requirement” on housing for employees, directed at H-2A foreign national farmworker visa-holders.
  • The text and legislative history of the restriction makes it clear that this ordinance was directed at housing for certain farmworker visa-holders, over 90% of whom are from Mexico.
  • The city agreed to review fines imposed under the ordinance for potential refunds, and hire an Employee Housing Resource Officer to address complaints about discrimination.

The U.S. Department of Housing and urban development (HUD) has reached a compliance/conciliation agreement (VCA) with the city of Santa Maria, California, resolving allegations that the city’s restrictions on housing for certain farmworker visa-holders in residential areas of the city violates the Fair Housing Act. It also violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act.

“There is a long history of segregation and exclusion of agricultural workers in this country,” said Jeanine Worden, HUD's acting assistant secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “Excluding residents from neighborhoods because of their race, color, or national origin violates fair housing laws. The Fair Housing Act is clear - jurisdictions may not zone people out of neighborhoods or towns based on their race, color, or national origin.”

The city ordinance imposed a “discretionary conditional use permit requirement” on housing for employees, directed at H-2A foreign national farmworker visa-holders. The text and legislative history of the restriction makes it clear that this ordinance was directed solely at housing for certain farmworker visa-holders, over 90% of whom are from Mexico. The Department filed a Secretary-Initiated Complaint on August 26, 2020, alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act. 

Finally, local government halted the enforcement of this ordinance. The city agreed to review fines imposed under the ordinance for potential refunds, and hire an Employee Housing Resource Officer to address complaints about discrimination and ensure the quality and safety of employee housing units. Additionally, the city agreed to make an effort in identifying other existing zoning laws that may be discriminatory. 

Under Title VI and Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act, HUD opened a compliance review regarding restrictions in April 2020. Housing discrimination complaints may also be filed by going to hud.gov/fairhousing

About the author
Staff Writer
Katie Jensen is a staff writer at NMP.
Published
Aug 09, 2021
Taking Fannie And Freddie Public A Good Move Or Not: NMP Readers Respond

Survey returns mixed, polarized results from respondents — along with significant uncertainty

5 Questions On Potential Changes To Fannie And Freddie

Polunsky Beitel Green Principal Marty Green talks changes at the GSEs and impacts they could have on housing and mortgage

Housing, Economic Leaders Embrace New Digital Opportunities

It’s Crypto Week at the Capitol, with some getting ready for breakthrough regulations that could change financial services

Some Question Lenders’ And Others’ Readiness To Use VantageScore 4.0

Following FHFA announcement Tuesday, doubts arise regarding potential changes that may be needed to move to VantageScore credit scoring

HUD Freezes Foreclosures On FHA Mortgages In Texas Flood Zone

Kerr County homeowners among hardest hit in disaster that’s claimed more than 100 lives

Jul 09, 2025
Fannie, Freddie Now Allow Lenders To Use VantageScore 4.0

Lenders will keep tri-merge credit scoring model; what this shift means