Skip to main content

California Dems Rush to Overturn Court Ruling on Foreclosure Settlement Funds

Aug 20, 2018

 
 
Democratic legislators in California are scrambling to create a new law that will void a recent court ruling that mandates the state use $331 million from a 2012 nationwide settlement with major mortgage servicers to aid homeowners impacted by abusive foreclosures.
 

According to a San Francisco Chronicle report, a state appeals court in Sacramento ruled last month that Gov. Jerry Brown improperly channeled the $331 million settlement into paying off the deficits of agencies responsible for state housing bonds and consumer programs. Although the state legislatures approved the funds allocation over the last three years, the court ruled that the state spend the funds on programs directly assisting foreclosed homeowners.
 

Joshua Gauger, a budget analyst with governor’s Finance Department, told the California Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee last week that the state did the right thing in not giving the funds to impacted homeowners. “In the heart of the recession, the state did the best it could in allocating money toward housing measures,” Gauger said.
 

The legislature’s Democratic-controlled Assembly and Senate have voted to send their respective versions of the legislation to the floor of each chamber for a full vote. The deadline for final passage is Aug. 31. Neil Barofsky, an attorney representing a coalition of organizations that questioned how the state used the funds, promised legal action if the legislation passes. Barofsky said that the “attempts to somehow retroactively endorse” the state’s use of the funds will not work because “those actions were still illegal, and the governor remains under an obligation to use the National Mortgage Settlement Funds as the appellate court found they were intended—to help struggling homeowners.”
 
 
About the author
Published
Aug 20, 2018
In Wake Of NAR Settlement, Dual Licensing Carries RESPA, Steering Risks

With the NAR settlement pending approval, lenders hot to hire buyers' agents ought to closely consider all the risks.

A California CRA Law Undercuts Itself

Who pays when compliance costs increase? Borrowers.

CFPB Weighs Title Insurance Changes

The agency considers a proposal that would prevent home lenders from passing on title insurance costs to home buyers.

Fannie Mae Weeds Out "Prohibited or Subjective" Appraisal Language

The overall occurrence rate for these violations has gone down, Fannie Mae reports.

Arizona Bans NTRAPS, Following Other States

ALTA on a war path to ban the "predatory practice of filing unfair real estate fee agreements in property records."

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Banning NTRAPS

The new law prohibits the recording of NTRAPS in property records, creates penalties if NTRAPS are recorded, and provides for the removal of NTRAPS currently in place.