Fannie Mae: Closing Costs A Barrier For First-Time, Low-Income Borrowers – NMP Skip to main content

Fannie Mae: Closing Costs A Barrier For First-Time, Low-Income Borrowers

David Krechevsky
Dec 07, 2021
No Entry

Working paper suggests several ways to help these borrowers overcome the closing-cost hurdle.

  • Fannie Mae’s analysis of approximately 1.1 million home purchase loans acquired by the Enterprise in 2020, found that more than 14% of low-income first-time homebuyers had closing costs equal to or exceeding their down payment.

First-time homebuyers, and especially minority borrowers, face numerous obstacles to homeownership. A recent analysis by Fannie Mae has found another: closing costs.

In its report, “Barriers to Entry: Closing Costs for First-Time and Low-Income Homebuyers,” Fannie Mae’s analysis of approximately 1.1 million home purchase loans acquired by the Enterprise in 2020, found that more than 14% of low-income first-time homebuyers had closing costs equal to or exceeding their down payment.

The report was written by Mark Palim, Fannie Mae’s vice president and chief economist, and Nuno Mota, an economist with Fannie Mae’s Economic & Strategic Research Group.

They found that If low-income first-time homebuyers had median closing costs as a percent of purchase price equal to the median for all buyers, their costs would have been reduced by $3,580 — a meaningful change that could lower the barrier to homeownership. The authors make the case that closing costs are regressive, meaning that low-income homebuyers pay more in median relative closing costs than all borrowers.

The report notes that among the nearly 1.1 million conventional home purchase loans sampled, median closing costs as a percent of home purchase price were 13% higher for low-income first-time homebuyers than for all homebuyers, and 19% higher than for non-low-income repeat homebuyers.

Here’s why that matters, according to the report.

“To make the transition into homeownership, a prospective owner must have sufficient savings at the time of purchase for a down payment, closing costs, and so-called reserves (a level of savings often required by lenders that is net of the down payment and projected closing costs),” the report states. “Having sufficient reserves is considered prudent underwriting, ensuring the borrower has sufficient savings to cover home repairs, unexpected expenses, or loss of income that may occur during the first few years of ownership.”

It continues, “Any homebuyer funds used for closing costs diminish the savings that a new homeowner will have when the transaction is complete. A lower level of savings post-transaction increases the chances that they will lose their home when adverse economic or other life events occur.”

The reports adds that higher closing costs also diminish the pool of prospective renters who could transition into homeownership.”

Within the low-income first-time homebuyer population, 21% of Black homebuyers and 19% of white Hispanic homebuyers paid closing costs equal to or greater than their down payment, compared with 6% and 14% of Asian and white non-Hispanic homebuyers, respectively, the report states.

Black and white Hispanic low-income first-time homebuyers on average paid higher closing costs relative to purchase price than their white non-Hispanic or Asian counterparts, the report states.

The authors note that homeownership has proven to be one of the most effective ways to improve the financial, social, and generational well-being of individuals, their families, and their communities, particularly for those without the means or savings to engage in other wealth-building activities, such as investing in stocks.

However, for decades, low- and moderate-income families in the United States — a group overrepresented by minorities and people of color — have struggled to make gains in homeownership.

“Most notably, the difference in the homeownership rates between Black and white households is not only about the same as it was in 1968, when the Fair Housing Act was signed into law, but in 1900, too, when explicit segregation was legally protected,” the report states.

Based on Fannie Mae’s ongoing research into this topic, the authors believe there are several areas where policymakers, regulators, and the mortgage industry could work together to reasonably reduce origination costs for first-time homebuyers without adding undue credit risk. They include:

  • Cap closing costs for qualifying first-time and low-income homeowners on a dollar-cost basis. This would allow first-time homeowners to know at the outset what their closing costs would be, to budget appropriately, and to enhance their ability to shop for the lowest-cost mortgage based on the mortgage terms.
  • For mortgages to first-time and low-income homebuyers, require lenders, investors, insurers, the GSEs, and other mortgage-market participants — not borrowers — to pay for services needed to manage risk. These could include credit reports, appraisals, and title insurance.
  • Local jurisdictions could explore ways to expand existing programs that waive or reduce one-time taxes and government fees borne by first-time and low-income homebuyers.
  • Federal, state, and local efforts to fund closing cost assistance programs, particularly in jurisdictions with high relative closing costs, could be expanded to help first-time and low-income first-time homebuyers.
  • Renew the effort to make the forms consumers receive, the Loan Estimate and Closing Disclosure, simpler and more transparent. This could include efforts to create new tools and homebuyer education resources to help borrowers compare and shop for services based on price.
  • Permit greater flexibility in how certain credit-risk management, title insurance, and settlement services are performed. For instance, Fannie Mae has allowed for automated valuation models to be used in lieu of a formal appraisal for many of its refinance loans for low-income borrowers — an example of how technology and improved use of data can reduce or eliminate the need for a traditional appraisal.

The authors acknowledge that many mortgage and housing market participants have a financial interest in the status quo. They argue that such interest should be balanced “against the real (if longer-term) benefits of expanding opportunities for people of color, low-income families, and others” whose pathway o wealth creation through homeownership is difficult at best.

Dec 07, 2021
Mortgage Debt Rose 14% From 2017-2021: Experian

The New York Federal Reserve Bank says Americans now hold more than $11 trillion in mortgage debt

Analysis and Data
Aug 12, 2022
Growing Housing Inventory Dampens Competition: Redfin

While new listings dropped 12%, overall housing supply is growing, giving buyers more choices.

Analysis and Data
Aug 12, 2022
Home Prices In Q2 Rose By Double-Digits In 4 In 5 Metro Areas

NAR report says housing affordability tumbled dramatically in the second quarter.

Analysis and Data
Aug 11, 2022
Inflation Taps Brakes In July, YOY Increase Dips To 8.5%

Consumer Price Index also was unchanged in July from June.

Analysis and Data
Aug 10, 2022
MBA: Mortgage Applications Increased Last Week

Applications increased .02%

Analysis and Data
Aug 10, 2022
July 2022 Funded Mortgage Volume Decreased 53% From 2021

Curinos’ latest ‘Mortgage Hot Topics’ data, released on August 4, revealed that funded volume in the retail channel was down 57%.

Analysis and Data
Aug 09, 2022