Builders, Lenders Back Revised Housing Bill After Investor Restrictions Softened
An amended House version of the ROAD to Housing Act removes a controversial build-to-rent selloff mandate while preserving broader supply and affordability measures
A bipartisan housing bill moving through Congress is drawing renewed support from builders and mortgage lenders after House lawmakers amended language that industry groups warned could disrupt build-to-rent financing and new single-family rental construction.
The revised House version of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act removes a Senate-passed provision that would have required large institutional investors to sell build-to-rent single-family homes to individual buyers after seven years. Industry groups had argued the measure could discourage capital investment and slow new housing development.
The latest House revisions come roughly two months after the Senate approved the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act in an 89-10 vote, advancing one of the most sweeping bipartisan housing packages in years. Mortgage and housing groups broadly supported the bill’s supply-focused provisions at the time but warned that certain investor restrictions and FHA-related language could create unintended market disruptions.
The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) endorsed the amended legislation, urging swift passage and calling the changes a step toward boosting housing supply.
“NAHB commends House leaders for reaching an agreement to amend the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act,” NAHB Chairman Bill Owens said, adding that the industry is looking for “greater certainty” to allow builders to increase production.
Mortgage lenders are also backing the revised bill.
In a statement ahead of House consideration, the Community Home Lenders of America (CHLA) said it “enthusiastically supports” the latest version of the legislation and urged lawmakers to pass it.
The group pointed to “unprecedented affordability challenges” facing Gen Z borrowers and said the bill includes several provisions aimed at expanding access to homeownership.
Among them is Section 301, which would eliminate the permanent chassis requirement for manufactured homes, a change CHLA said could increase the supply of one of the nation’s most affordable housing options.
CHLA was among the mortgage trade groups that previously supported the broader housing package while raising concerns about portions of the Senate version tied to investor restrictions and housing finance provisions.
The group also highlighted provisions designed to promote small-dollar mortgage lending, including Sections 105, 401 and 402, which aim to improve access to financing for lower-cost homes, a segment many lenders have struggled to serve profitably in recent years.
The broader legislation remains focused on expanding housing supply and lowering development barriers. It includes provisions to incentivize local housing production, streamline regulatory processes and address financing challenges tied to affordability.
For mortgage professionals, the bill’s trajectory matters because housing supply remains one of the biggest constraints on purchase lending.
While the original investor restrictions were intended to address concerns about corporate ownership of single-family homes, industry critics warned the build-to-rent selloff requirement could have reduced construction activity and limited rental supply, particularly for households not yet ready to buy.
The amended version attempts to balance those concerns by preserving broader housing reforms while removing a provision that developers and lenders said could disrupt financing and development pipelines.
The legislation still needs to pass the House and would require Senate approval before becoming law.
What It Means For Mortgage Pros
- More supply = more opportunity: Provisions supporting construction, manufactured housing and small-dollar lending could expand entry-level inventory.
- Manufactured housing gains traction: Removing chassis restrictions may improve financing and acceptance of factory-built homes.
- Small-loan economics in focus: Targeted reforms could make lower-balance mortgages more viable for lenders.
- Investor debate isn’t over: Policymakers remain focused on institutional ownership, which could continue to shape inventory dynamics and borrower competition.