Some regulators have recently started expressing concern that the input might have built-in bias or discrimination. Many creditors rely on the software and current algorithms to make the lending decision for a loan approval or denial. However, the creditor is ultimately responsible for ensuring that fair lending laws are adhered to and all clients are being treated equally. Creditors must be able to clearly demonstrate how the lending decision was derived.
The mission of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is to hold creditors accountable for all lending decisions regardless of the technology used in the decision-making process.
Some creditors may make credit decisions based on certain complex algorithms, sometimes referred to as uninterpretable or “black-box” models, that make it difficult — if not impossible — to accurately identify the specific reasons for denying credit or taking other adverse actions. The adverse action notice requirements of ECOA and Regulation B, however, apply equally to all credit decisions, regardless of the technology used to make them. Thus, ECOA (Equal Credit Opportunity Act) and Regulation B do not permit creditors to use complex algorithms when doing so means they cannot provide the specific and accurate reasons for adverse actions. CFPB Circular 2022-03 May 26, 2022
ECOA Regulation B specifies that the loan decision can only be made based on the creditworthiness of the applicant. It prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, or public assistance programs.
If the mortgage company cannot identify the proper reason, it becomes nearly impossible to defend the decision to decline the loan based solely on the credit of the applicant.
When a creditor enters into the computer the borrower’s personal information such as race, color, national origin, sex, marital status, age, and any income derived from public assistance, it will be important to know if a decision made by a complex algorithm was influenced by any one of these factors as that could be considered discrimination.