TCPA Class Action Targets Swift Home Loans Over Alleged Spam Calls And Texts – NMP Skip to main content

TCPA Class Action Targets Swift Home Loans Over Alleged Spam Calls And Texts

Oct 28, 2025
Swift Home Loans TCPA
Associate Editor

The plaintiff alleges that Swift Home Loans used trigger leads to bombard consumers with unsolicited texts and calls

Swift Home Loans Inc., a Michigan-based mortgage lender, is facing a federal class action lawsuit alleging it bombarded consumers with unwanted text messages.

In an amended complaint filed Oct. 20, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, plaintiff Melanee Packard claims that Swift Home Loans violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending telemarketing texts to phone numbers listed on the National Do Not Call Registry.

Packard claims that Swift Home Loans promotes its services by sending mass marketing texts to consumers without prior consent, including individuals who had no existing business relationship with the company. She alleges that the company obtained contact information through the purchase of trigger leads, consumer data generated and sold by the credit bureaus when a mortgage credit inquiry is made, and then used those leads to target consumers with marketing messages.

Although TCPA lawsuits are nothing new to the mortgage industry, not as many complaints specifically target a lenders’ use — or alleged abuse — of trigger leads. Last month, President Trump signed off on the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (H.R. 2808), which is expected to curb the use of trigger leads across the industry, but that law goes into effect next year, March 5, 2026.

Rather, Packard’s complaint addresses existing TCPA regulations, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(c), which provides that “[n]o person or entity shall initiate any telephone solicitation” to “[a] residential telephone subscriber who has registered his or her telephone number on the national do-not-call registry … that is maintained by the federal government,” the complaint reads.

Packard allegedly received two unsolicited text messages in July 2025 from a number associated with Swift Home Loans, offering lower VA mortgage rates and referencing a June 2024 mortgage closing that she said never occurred. She also claims that she’s never done business with the company, never provided her phone number, and that her number had been listed on the National Do Not Call Registry since 2008.

The complaint reference quotes another consumer who called Swift Home Loans, “the country’s worst offenders when it comes to credit triggers,” in an online Reddit post. The consumer further claimed “They are almost exclusively ex Rocket Mortgage employees, generally the ones that were liars and manipulators on the phones. They are high-skilled and highly motivated killers. They call on triggers and pretend to be the original source of the credit pull, like literally saying they are the company that the person was working with calling from a different number.”

According to NMLS Consumer Access, Swift currently has 147 MLOs on staff as of October 2025, and Modex shows the company closed a total $3.52 billion among 9,836 loans in the past 12 month — most (85%) were refinances. The company, a broker and correspondent lender, mainly banks its loans (91%), and only brokers roughly 8% of loans with a few wholesalers like AmWest Funding, HomeBridge Financial, and United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM). 

According to the complaint, those marketing efforts were part of a “high-pressure business model” aimed at intercepting consumers during, or shortly after, a mortgage transaction with another lender. The complaint alleged that Swift Home Loans often misrepresented itself as being affiliated with a consumer’s existing lender, and that such practices caused “confusion, annoyance, and harassment” among recipients.

The proposed class covers U.S. persons who, “from four years prior to the filing through class certification,” received more than one call and/or text from Swift within any 12-month period while their residential number had been on the National DNC for at least 30 days, for substantially the same reason Swift texted Packard, and despite not having provided their number to Swift.
 

About the author
Associate Editor
Katie Jensen is a mortgage news reporter at NMP.
Published
Oct 28, 2025
More from
Courts
Garg Pitches $2 Billion Better Turnaround; Board Calls Plan ‘Unworkable’

Former CEO targets zero monthly cash burn through higher mortgage volume, AI-driven operating changes, and $2 million in monthly savings

Sep 04, 2026
UWM’s $603 Million Hedge Loss Has Drawn Three Shareholder Lawsuits — So Far

One securities class action challenges UWM’s disclosures, while two newer stockholder suits target board oversight of the $27.5 billion derivatives position

Sep 03, 2026
Rocket Adds New Broker Allegations, Refinance Data To UWM Lawsuit

Amended complaint adds a named broker, new loan-level figures and a claim that damages have climbed to at least $100 million

Sep 01, 2026
Better’s $15 Million Offer To Garg Complicates Its Case Against Him

The mortgage lender portrayed its founder as unfit to lead, but Garg says it offered him a lucrative advisory role three days after firing him

Aug 26, 2026
Veterans United Fails To Knock Out Core RESPA Theory

The latest court order represents a significant 'mixed bag' for both sides

Aug 24, 2026
Better Deploys Poison Pill In Escalating Fight With Garg

The shareholder rights plan adds a 15% ownership trigger while the former CEO solicits shareholder consent to remove five of Better’s eight directors

Aug 20, 2026